Four pillars, not one number
Technology, process, people and data are scored separately. A strong platform paired with an unprepared team is a very different problem from the reverse, and one blended score would hide that.
Find out whether your business is ready to invest in new systems, and what to fix first if it is not. Twenty statements, two minutes, and your score appears immediately.
Rate 20 statements about how your business runs today. You will see your score and your biggest gaps immediately. No email is required to view your results.
Infrastructure, integrations and security
Workflows, automation and measurement
Skills, ownership and appetite for change
Access, governance and reporting
Technology, process, people and data are scored separately. A strong platform paired with an unprepared team is a very different problem from the reverse, and one blended score would hide that.
Statements that consistently determine whether a transformation succeeds, such as system integration, executive sponsorship and connected data, carry more weight than the ones that are merely useful.
Your results surface the specific statements where the most weighted score was lost, so the first thing you read is the thing worth fixing first.
About two minutes. You rate 20 short statements spread across four screens (technology, process, people and data) with five statements on each screen.
No. Your score, the pillar-by-pillar breakdown and your three highest-impact gaps all appear as soon as you finish the last section. An email is only needed if you want the full written report and 90-day action plan sent to you.
Each statement carries a weight of 2 or 3 depending on how much it affects transformation outcomes. Rating a statement "Yes" earns its full weight, "Partly" earns half, and "Not yet" earns none. Your score is the total earned weight as a percentage of the maximum, so the questions that matter most move your score the most.
Most organizations have processes and systems that are partly in place: documented but not followed, or automated in one department only. A three-point scale reflects that reality and produces a score you can act on, rather than forcing an inaccurate yes or no.
Early Stage (0–39) means the foundations need work before new software will pay off. Developing (40–59) means real building blocks exist but are uneven. Intermediate (60–79) means you are ready to scale once specific gaps close. Advanced (80–100) means you are ready for deeper automation and analytics work.
Yes. Use "Review my answers" on the results screen to step back through any section, or jump directly to a section using the section rail. Your score updates as soon as you change an answer. Progress is also kept if you refresh the page during the assessment.
The assessment scores 20 statements across four pillars: Technology, Process, People, and Data. Each statement carries a weight of 2 (important) or 3 (critical), and each answer earns its full weight for Yes, half for Partly, and nothing for Not yet. Your score is earned points divided by the 49 possible, times 100, mapped to one of four readiness bands, with per-pillar scores and your highest-weight gaps reported alongside.
This answer path produces a score of 51 out of 100, the Developing band (40 to 59), Process as the weakest pillar at 33, and automating repetitive work as the first recommended fix.
| Answer | Meaning | Share of question weight earned |
|---|---|---|
| Yes | In place and working | 100% |
| Partly | Started or inconsistent | 50% |
| Not yet | No plan in place | 0% |
Unanswered questions still count toward the denominator, so a partial run cannot inflate the score.
| Score | Level | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| 0-39 | Early Stage | Foundations first: infrastructure, ownership, and data before new software |
| 40-59 | Developing | Real building blocks, but uneven; focus on the two weakest pillars |
| 60-79 | Intermediate | Solid foundation; ready to scale once the specific gaps are closed |
| 80-100 | Advanced | Well prepared; the opportunity is deeper automation, predictive analytics, and AI |
A pillar scoring below 70 additionally triggers targeted advice for that pillar.
| Pillar | Statement | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Technology | Critical systems are cloud-hosted, or ready to be migrated | 3 |
| Technology | Core systems exchange data automatically through APIs or integrations | 3 |
| Process | Repetitive work like data entry, approvals and reporting is automated | 3 |
| Process | Process performance is reviewed on a schedule and acted on | 3 |
| People | The team adopts new software comfortably, without heavy hand-holding | 3 |
| People | Leadership actively sponsors and funds technology initiatives | 3 |
| Data | Data lives in connected systems, not scattered spreadsheets and silos | 3 |
| Data | Decisions are backed by data and analysis, not experience alone | 3 |
Selected: 9 of the 20 questions carry weight 3 (the ninth covers teams suggesting improvements and being willing to change); the other 11 carry weight 2, for 49 total points.
These are the same weights, bands, and scoring rules the assessment above runs on. See the full method
Everything on this topic that lives elsewhere on the site.
80% fewer manual errors, 50% faster order processing
Distributor WMS case studyProject management at Rorix is top-notch. They deliver on time, stay responsive, and adapt to our needs. They don’t just stop when daily tasks are done, they keep refining lower-priority items and actively suggest improvements to better the system.